Can we make a rule that if you are searching for love online without a photo – then you, in return, can’t see anyone’s photo?
“im new to this whole concept.but you seem my type,;)
i realise showing a topless pic of me and no face is not a good start but would you believe im actually almost as hot as you 🙂 and that is the only pic i know that doesnt have my face in shot that i could think of(its seems vein but if you ant a pic just send me an email address that you’d be happy for me to send to an i shall)
im starting a fitness enterprise new year and doing a marathon in april for charity
I really am a charming well to do guy whos just a bit unlucky i think.
p.s you seem really cute an if i saw you on a noght out i wouldn’t hesitate to say hello.”
I am sure Mr. Shirtless is probably a nice guy.. but, spelling and grammar do go a long way. I cringe just looking at this. And, you just know it’s a form letter too, since he felt so inclined to add the P.S. to it. First he’s actually almost as hot as I am, but then P.S. I seem really cute? To me, cute and hot are different categories. (We could discuss that in the comments if I’m wrong.)
Seriously.. This message is nothing a little spell check wouldn’t fix. It’s SO easy to use, too. (However, only he can help not showing his face.)
I wouldn’t want my face associated with that grammar either.
I use cute and hot interchangeably, but I’ve noticed girls tend not to. I see “hot” aa slightly more vulgar version of “cute”. And no, cute kittens and children aren’t “hot”, cuz context. (e.g. “i love pizza” vs “i love that woman”)
LikeLike